许多点和线特征实际上是描述一个具有定义宽度的特征，而不是描述实际的地理空间区域。例如，一条有长度但也有宽度的路;井位通常被定义为一个点，但通常是一个给定的面积，通常用点和线来表示。我想在创建功能选项中提出这个想法(如果这还不存在)，在创建这些功能时应用宽度。它们不是点和线的特征，而是多边形，但它们将在视觉上被管理为单个向量或向量串。道路的例子....大多数道路都是标准宽度，所以我们会将特征创建为多边形而不是直线，但道路的中心线将由向量点的直线表示，并且程序将自动创建缓冲区，例如在本例中，中心线两侧各10'，以创建20'宽的多边形。然后如果你想移动道路，你只需要激活中心线上的向量，边缘就会分别调整。我不明白为什么你不能激活沿着边缘的矢量，并调整它们，以纳入一个特征，比如沿着道路拉出，道路变宽，你想要解释那个宽点。井场示例....The well site might occupy on average a 1/2 area, the exact shape of the area may not be as important as the size of the area. So you could define the area by radius, circumference, or acreage or square feet or whatever. I see several benefits to this. The first of which, is you could manage all three features as polygons, which in my amature opinion makes data management muuuuuch easier (I work in natural resources). Also, since things like roads actually occupy space, the data associated with the space it occupies becomes available and makes other spatial data more accurate and useful. For example if you have a 10 acre grazing pasture, and it has several roads through it, how many acres of pasture do you actually have. Although you could buffer your lines to get a similar result, that is an extra step, creates more data to manage and again, you lose the benefit of managing the road data as a polygon in conjunction with the pasture data. And it is super tedious if not near impossible to try and create a feature that is very thin with any degree of accuracy by hand. Hopefully you find my idea inspiring or maybe someone can show me that this already exists
…查看更多
